Lexi for the law schools

Bring the practice of law into the way we learn it.

Name: Lexi
Availability: InStock
Author: Lexi

Give law students new ways to explore legal questions, develop practical skills and engage more deeply with the law.
Partner with Lexi to help prepare the next generation of legal professionals for a changing world.

Brief the case

Drag each tag on to its paragraph

Court of Appeal · Civil Division

Mason v Harbour Stores Ltd

Judgment delivered 14 March · Ward LJ

[12]The claimant slipped on a wet floor by the entrance. Staff had known of the spill for twenty minutes, and no warning sign had been put out.

[13]The question is whether the store owed its customers a duty to warn them of a hazard it already knew about.

[14]An occupier must take such care as is reasonable in all the circumstances to see that visitors will be reasonably safe.

[15]The store fell short of that duty. The judge was right to find it liable, and the appeal is dismissed.

Checking your reading

Drag each tag to the paragraph it describes. I’ll check your reading.

Case brief

Mason v Harbour Stores Ltd

Facts-

Issue-

Rule-

Holding-

0 of 4 tagged

A practical approach to legal AI education.

The needs of a student, a faculty member and an institution are different. The programme should recognise that from the start.

Student experience

Build the habits behind stronger legal work.

Learn to use AI as a research and drafting aid without outsourcing the reasoning that makes legal work your own.

Organise facts, issues and legal reasoning, then return to the judgment to test your understanding.

Move from search terms to legal issues, then follow the authorities that actually answer the question.

Draft notes, memos and arguments, then revise them against the sources and the feedback you receive.

Check every output, cite what you rely on and keep the judgment that makes the work your own.

JudgmentRead the case: what happened, and why?

FactsWorking…MarkedWho did what, and when

IssueWorking…MarkedWas a duty of care owed?

ReasoningWorking…MarkedWhy the court said yes

SearchLandlord liability for a broken stair

Legal issueWorking…FoundThe occupier's duty to visitors

Leading authorityWorking…RelevantThe case that settles the point

Later caseWorking…RelevantApplied on similar facts

AssignmentWrite a memo on the duty question

OutlineWorking…DoneIssue, rule, application

First draftWorking…DoneTwo pages, sources cited

FeedbackWorking…RevisedTighten the application

Your memoCheck every authority you cite

Citation 1Working…VerifiedMatches the judgment

Citation 2Working…VerifiedQuote checked at para. 14

Citation 3Working…RemovedNot found in the source

Faculty experience

Bring AI into the classroom without lowering the bar.

Give students a structured way to examine AI-assisted legal work, test its sources and defend their own conclusions.

Ask students to check authorities, compare sources and explain why a source does or does not support a proposition.

Have students outline, draft and revise in stages, so the reasoning behind each version stays visible.

Ask students to critique AI-assisted work, flag weak authority and explain what they would change.

Agree where AI may be used in coursework and assessment, and how students should disclose it.

ExerciseDoes each source support the claim?

Source AWorking…SupportsHolds on the same facts

Source BWorking…Does notDecided on different facts

Your answerWorking…SubmittedExplain why, in writing

AssignmentDraft an advice letter in stages

Stage 1Working…ReviewedOutline the issues

Stage 2Working…ReviewedDraft the advice

Stage 3Working…SubmittedRevise against feedback

AI-assisted answerCritique it before relying on it

AuthorityWorking…WeakOverruled by a later case

ReasoningWorking…GapMisses the key exception

Student's fixWorking…ImprovedA stronger case, cited

Course policyWhere AI may be used in this course

ResearchWorking…AllowedAllowed, with checking

Assessed essaysWorking…RestrictedNot without permission

DisclosureWorking…RequiredSay how AI was used

Institutional partnership

Adopt with intent. Introduce with care.

Shape a practical programme around your school's academic priorities, teaching approach and policy on responsible technology use.

Choose the courses, cohorts or learning activities where legal AI can add practical value.

Faculty shape how Lexi is introduced, so its use follows the school's teaching rather than leading it.

Start with a defined group, gather feedback and extend access as the programme proves its value.

Look back at how students used Lexi and what it changed in their work before deciding what comes next.

Learning scopeWhere legal AI adds real value

Legal Research & WritingWorking…SelectedFirst-year cohort

Contract LawWorking…SelectedDrafting exercises

Legal clinicWorking…SelectedSupervised client work

FacultyShape how Lexi is introduced

OrientationWorking…DoneFaculty try it first

GuidanceWorking…DoneRules of use agreed

StudentsWorking…LiveIntroduced in class

RolloutStart small, then extend access

PilotWorking…DoneOne course, one term

FeedbackWorking…DoneStudents and faculty asked

Next cohortWorking…LiveAccess extended

Term reviewWhat changed in students' work?

ResearchWorking…ReviewedSources checked more often

WritingWorking…ReviewedClearer structure in drafts

Next termWorking…PlannedDecide what comes next

Move from legal concepts to professional application.

A programme should make the connection between classroom learning and legal practice visible, without suggesting that software replaces a law school's teaching.

Ask better legal questions.
Frame issues, explore relevant authorities and verify every important proposition against its source.
Work through the record.
Review case materials, organise facts and identify details that deserve closer legal examination.
Turn reasoning into writing.
Practise clear first drafts, revise arguments and assess how structure affects legal communication.
Prepare for real workflows.
Build familiarity with the research, review and matter tasks that appear in modern legal teams.

Four foundations for responsible legal AI fluency.

A modular starting point for a workshop series, elective, clinic or faculty-led programme. The final curriculum should be shaped by the institution.

Understand the system
What legal AI can do, where it can fail, and why prompts, context and source quality shape the output.
Research with evidence
Use legal research tools to explore questions, locate authorities and verify quotations, citations and legal propositions.
Draft, review and refine
Examine how AI can support first drafts and document review while the student remains responsible for analysis and final work.
Apply professional judgment
Discuss confidentiality, academic integrity, disclosure, bias, accountability and the limits of automated assistance.

FAQ’s

The proposed model can include a faculty discussion, an agreed student learning scope, product orientation and responsible-use guidance. Access, duration, materials and support are finalised with each institution before launch.

Yes. A partnership can start with a single course, clinic or cohort, and the learning scope is agreed with faculty before launch.

No. Lexi supports the research and writing skills a law school teaches. Students still learn to find, read and verify authorities themselves.

That is for each institution to decide. We help faculty set clear rules of use, including where AI is allowed and how its use should be disclosed.

Yes. Faculty can receive a product orientation and guidance on responsible use before students are introduced to Lexi.

Write to hi@getlexi.io with your school, the courses you have in mind and a faculty contact, and our team will arrange a first conversation.

See Lexi in action

See your legal work come together.

Explore how Lexi brings research, documents and matter management into one connected workspace. Book a personalised demo built around the way your team works.

Book a demo

Bring the practice of law into the way we learn it.

A practical approach to legal AI education.

Build the habits behind stronger legal work.

Read cases with purpose.

Research beyond keywords.

Practise the written work.

Learn to work responsibly.

Bring AI into the classroom without lowering the bar.

Set source-led exercises.

Teach drafting as a process.

Make review more deliberate.

Set the rules of use.

Adopt with intent. Introduce with care.

A defined learning scope.

Faculty-led introduction.

A considered rollout.

Review what students learn.

Move from legal concepts to professional application.

Ask better legal questions.

Work through the record.

Turn reasoning into writing.

Prepare for real workflows.

Four foundations for responsible legal AI fluency.

Understand the system

Research with evidence

Draft, review and refine

Apply professional judgment

FAQ’s

What does a Lexi law school partnership include?

Can Lexi be used for specific courses or clinics?

Does Lexi replace legal research training?

How should students use AI in assessed work?

Can faculty receive onboarding and training?

How do we start a partnership discussion?

See your legal work come together.